Messing v. Bank of America, N.A.
Maryland Court of Appeals
821 A.2d 22 (2003)
- Written by Steven Pacht, JD
Facts
Jeff Messing (plaintiff) received a check for $976 drawn on Toyson Burruss’s account with the Bank of America, N.A. (BOA) (defendant). Messing did not have an account with BOA but went to a BOA branch to cash the check over the counter. After confirming that Burruss’s account had sufficient funds, the teller had her computer stamp certain information on the back of the check. Messing then endorsed the check and provided the teller with his driver’s license and a major credit card to verify his identity, after which the teller removed $976 from her cash drawer. However, Messing balked when the teller asked him to place his inkless thumbprint on the check. The teller’s request was pursuant to BOA’s policy for cashing checks over the counter for noncustomers. Unable to cash the check at BOA, Messing sued BOA, seeking a declaratory judgment that BOA violated the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) and his privacy rights by requiring a thumbprint. Specifically, Messing alleged, among other things, that (1) he properly presented, and BOA accepted, the check for payment and (2) BOA’s thumbprint request was unreasonable because he provided sufficient identification and a thumbprint could only confirm his identity in the future. BOA responded, among other things, that (1) it had no UCC duty to cash a check for a noncustomer and could not be liable to a noncustomer, (2) it never accepted the check because Messing refused to provide his thumbprint, and (3) its thumbprint requirement was reasonable. The trial court granted summary judgment to BOA. The court of appeals affirmed. Messing appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Harrell, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Eldridge, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.