Methodist Mission Home of Texas v. N__ A__ B__
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas
451 S.W.2d 539 (1970)
- Written by Denise McGimsey, JD
Facts
N__ A__ B__ (NAB) (plaintiff) went to reside at the Methodist Mission Home of Texas (Methodist Mission) (defendant), which provides services and counseling to unwed expectant mothers. As a policy and practice, Methodist Mission encourages its residents to give up their children for adoption. During NAB’s pregnancy, Methodist Mission believed that she would give the baby up for adoption and did not suggest that she consider any alternative. After her son’s birth, NAB told Methodist Mission that she intended to keep the baby. Over a five-day period during which NAB was physically and emotionally exhausted, her individual counselor, Jo Ann Burns, subjected NAB to continual harassment over her decision to keep the child: (1) reciting all of the associated negatives, without any positives, (2) criticizing NAB as a bad and selfish person, (3) telling her she had no right to keep the baby, and (4) inducing her to believe that her parents’ offer of support if she kept the baby was a sham. After being subjected to days of Burns’s pressure, NAB agreed to give up her son. She later filed suit to revoke that decision, alleging that it had been procured through undue influence. A jury agreed. Methodist Mission appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cadena, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.