From our private database of 13,000+ case briefs...
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. v. Scheider
Court of Appeals of New York
360 N.E.2d 930 (1976)
Scheider (defendant), an actor, contracted with Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. (Metro) (plaintiff) to star in one film and a subsequent television series. The only material term not negotiated in advance by the parties was the start date of filming the television series. Scheider completed work on the film, but refused to do the television series. Metro brought suit in New York state court seeking to enforce the contract. The trial court upheld the contract by supplying the missing start date based on established custom in the film industry. Scheider appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 129,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,000 briefs, keyed to 177 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.