Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios v. Grokster
United States District Court for the Central District of California
518 F. Supp. 2d 1197 (1997)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
Grokster, Ltd. (defendant) and StreamCast Networks, Inc. (StreamCast) (defendant) distributed free software enabling peer-to-peer sharing of music and video files among internet users. Much of the content being shared was copyrighted. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios was part of a group of motion-picture studios, record companies, and other entities (the copyright holders) (plaintiffs) that brought a copyright-infringement action in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The court granted summary judgment in favor of Grokster and StreamCast, holding that the infringement occurred on the level of individual users of the software. The court of appeals affirmed. The case was then appealed to the United States Supreme Court, which reversed, holding that the Grokster and StreamCast were liable for the infringement that occurred as a result of the distribution of their software. The case was then remanded back to the district court, with StreamCast being the only remaining defendant. The copyright holders moved for a permanent injunction against StreamCast to prevent further infringement.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wilson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.