Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios v. Grokster

518 F. Supp. 2d 1197 (1997)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios v. Grokster

United States District Court for the Central District of California
518 F. Supp. 2d 1197 (1997)

Play video

Facts

Grokster, Ltd. (defendant) and StreamCast Networks, Inc. (StreamCast) (defendant) distributed free software enabling peer-to-peer sharing of music and video files among internet users. Much of the content being shared was copyrighted. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios was part of a group of motion-picture studios, record companies, and other entities (the copyright holders) (plaintiffs) that brought a copyright-infringement action in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The court granted summary judgment in favor of Grokster and StreamCast, holding that the infringement occurred on the level of individual users of the software. The court of appeals affirmed. The case was then appealed to the United States Supreme Court, which reversed, holding that the Grokster and StreamCast were liable for the infringement that occurred as a result of the distribution of their software. The case was then remanded back to the district court, with StreamCast being the only remaining defendant. The copyright holders moved for a permanent injunction against StreamCast to prevent further infringement.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wilson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership