Metropolitan Creditors Service v. Sadri

19 Cal. Rptr. 2d 646 (1993)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
M
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Metropolitan Creditors Service v. Sadri

California Court of Appeal
19 Cal. Rptr. 2d 646 (1993)

  • Written by Mary Pfotenhauer, JD

Facts

Sadri (defendant), a California resident, incurred a large gambling debt at a casino in Nevada. In exchange for two personal checks and two memoranda of indebtedness for the amount of the gambling debt, the casino gave Sadri additional chips, which Sadri lost while gambling at the casino. Sadri then stopped payment on the checks and memoranda. The casino assigned any claims it had on the checks and memoranda to Metropolitan Creditors Service (MCS) (plaintiff). MCS sued Sadri in California to collect the gambling debt. The municipal court entered judgment for Sadri, finding that, although Nevada law allows a cause of action for enforcement of gambling debts, judicial enforcement of Sadri’s gambling debts was against public policy in California, and the checks and memoranda were therefore unenforceable. The appellate court affirmed, and MCS appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (King, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 812,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Contracts

Key Terms