Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Ward
United States Supreme Court
470 U.S. 869 (1985)
An Alabama law taxed out-of-state insurance companies at higher rates than Alabama insurance companies. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. and other out-of-state insurance companies (plaintiffs) brought suit, claiming that the law violated the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution. The trial court found the law constitutional, ruling that it served two legitimate purposes: encouraging the formation of new insurance companies in Alabama and encouraging out-of-state insurance companies to invest in Alabama assets and securities. The court further held that the tax distinction between in-state and out-of-state companies was rationally related to those purposes. The plaintiffs appealed with regards to the legitimacy of the two purposes.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Powell, J.)
Dissent (O’Connor, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.