Metropolitan Taxicab Board of Trade v. City of New York

615 F.3d 152 (2010)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Metropolitan Taxicab Board of Trade v. City of New York

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
615 F.3d 152 (2010)

Facts

In December 2007, the City of New York (city) (defendant) issued rules requiring new taxicabs to have a gas mileage of either 25 or 30 miles per gallon, depending on the date on which they were put into service. The city repealed these rules after a district court enjoined them on grounds that, as rules relating to fuel-economy standards, they were preempted by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 (EPCA), which established national fuel-efficiency standards, and by the Clean Air Act (CAA). The city then issued new rules that set caps on the maximum amount that taxis could be leased for per shift. The rules distinguished between types of vehicles. Lease caps for hybrid and clean-diesel taxis were raised by $3 per shift, and lease caps for taxis that were not hybrids or clean diesel were reduced by $12 per shift. The rules were designed to incentivize reduced fuel use and cleaner taxis. The Metropolitan Taxicab Board of Trade (plaintiff), which had been a plaintiff in the case involving the earlier, repealed rule, moved for a preliminary injunction against these new rules, again arguing that they were preempted by the EPCA and the CAA.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Walker, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership