Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

MetWest, Inc. v. Secretary of Labor

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
560 F.3d 506 (2009)


Facts

In 1991, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), part of the Department of Labor (defendant), promulgated safety standards regarding the removal of needles used to draw blood. The 1991 regulation allowed for the removal of contaminated needles in certain circumstances, but provided that if such removal was allowed, it must be accomplished through the use of a mechanical device or a one-handed technique. The agency initially declined to enforce this section against employers who supplied their employees with reusable blood tube holders. In 2003, OSHA issued a guidance document stating that reusable blood tube holders likely violated the 1991 regulation. Although its parent company operated facilities that employed single-use blood tube holders, MetWest, Inc. (plaintiff) typically supplied phlebotomists with reusable holders. In 2004, an OSHA compliance officer issued a citation to MetWest for allowing the removal of needles from reusable blood tube holders in violation of the 1991 regulation. An Administrative Law Judge and the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission upheld the citation. MetWest petitioned for judicial review.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Randolph, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.