United States District Court for the Northern District of California
291 F. 780 (1923)
In 1914, the sister of Karoline Schwab passed away, bequeathing to her property in Sacramento, as well as money from her estate. Karoline was a German citizen, residing in Germany at the time of her sister’s death. Upon inheriting this property, Karoline wrote several letters to her son Metzger (plaintiff), who was living in the United States and is a naturalized citizen. These letters stated that the property she inherited was to be given to him, and that the only part of the inheritance she wanted was the money left by her sister’s estate. In 1917, Miller (defendant) seized the property in question under the Trading with the Enemy Act. Metzger brought suit, claiming that the property had already been conveyed to him and could not be seized because he was a naturalized citizen.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Van Fleet, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 240,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.