Meyer v. Hawkinson
North Dakota Supreme Court
626 N.W.2d 262 (2001)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Clyde Meyer (plaintiff) went on vacation in Canada with Donald Hawkinson (defendant). Hawkinson purchased a lottery ticket, and Meyer purchased three lottery tickets. Meyer and Hawkinson agreed to share any proceeds from the tickets. Hawkinson’s ticket won $1.2 million. Hawkinson declined to share the proceeds with Meyer. Meyer brought suit in North Dakota district court to enforce the agreement with Hawkinson. North Dakota law largely prohibited lotteries in the state, except for charitable purposes. Specifically, North Dakota prohibited the sale, purchase, receipt, or transfer of a chance to win a lottery, regardless of where the lottery was drawn and regardless of the lottery’s legality in the forum in which it was drawn. The district court granted Hawkinson summary judgment, finding as a matter of law that the contract was unenforceable as against the public policy. Meyer appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kapsner, J.)
Dissent (Sandstrom, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.