Michigan Employment Relations Commission v. Detroit Symphony Orchestra
Michigan Supreme Court
393 Mich. 116, 223 N.W.2d 283 (1974)
- Written by Kyli Cotten, JD
Facts
Allen Chase (plaintiff) was a trombonist employed with the Detroit Symphony Orchestra (the symphony) (defendant). Chase was also a member of a union that oversaw employment contracts between musicians and the symphony. Chase attempted to renegotiate his pay with the manager of the symphony. Chase declined the offer extended, and the symphony subsequently auditioned for a new trombonist. Chase reapplied for the position but was ultimately not given the job. Chase brought a claim through the Michigan Employment Relations Commissions Board (MERC) (plaintiff), alleging that the symphony’s actions in not hiring him were discriminatory and due to an antiunion animus. At an evidentiary hearing, a trial examiner found that there was not sufficient evidence to establish discrimination and recommended dismissal of the charge against the symphony. MERC disagreed with the findings and found that the symphony had acted discriminatorily. On appeal, the Michigan Court of Appeals concluded that MERC’s findings were not supported by substantial evidence and declined to enforce the order of the MERC board.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fitzgerald, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.