Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
M

Michigan Employment Relations Commission v. Detroit Symphony Orchestra

393 Mich. 116, 223 N.W.2d 283 (1974)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Michigan Employment Relations Commission v. Detroit Symphony Orchestra

Michigan Supreme Court
393 Mich. 116, 223 N.W.2d 283 (1974)

Facts

Allen Chase (plaintiff) was a trombonist employed with the Detroit Symphony Orchestra (the symphony) (defendant). Chase was also a member of a union that oversaw employment contracts between musicians and the symphony. Chase attempted to renegotiate his pay with the manager of the symphony. Chase declined the offer extended, and the symphony subsequently auditioned for a new trombonist. Chase reapplied for the position but was ultimately not given the job. Chase brought a claim through the Michigan Employment Relations Commissions Board (MERC) (plaintiff), alleging that the symphony’s actions in not hiring him were discriminatory and due to an antiunion animus. At an evidentiary hearing, a trial examiner found that there was not sufficient evidence to establish discrimination and recommended dismissal of the charge against the symphony. MERC disagreed with the findings and found that the symphony had acted discriminatorily. On appeal, the Michigan Court of Appeals concluded that MERC’s findings were not supported by substantial evidence and declined to enforce the order of the MERC board.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fitzgerald, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Entertainment Law

Key Terms