Michigan United Conservation Coalition v. Secretary of State

630 N.W.2d 297 (2001)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Michigan United Conservation Coalition v. Secretary of State

Michigan Supreme Court
630 N.W.2d 297 (2001)

JC

Facts

A controversial Michigan legislative act—2000 Public Act 381 (2000 PA 381)—was passed, allowing for much easier access to concealed-weapons permits. The act also included a $1 million grant to the Michigan state police. While the state of Michigan allowed for a ballot referendum, it limited such questions to exclude acts that made appropriations for state institutions. Nevertheless, given the political thrust of the act, a referendum was requested. At that time, Michigan United Conservation Clubs and another organization, as well as three individuals who wished to obtain concealed-weapons permits (the concealed-weapons advocates) (plaintiffs), filed suit seeking to prevent the Michigan secretary of state (defendant) from conducting a recall regarding 2000 PA 381. An appellate court ruled against the concealed-weapons advocates, finding that the referendum could occur. The concealed-weapons advocates appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Taylor, J.)

Concurrence (Corrigan, C.J.)

Dissent (Cavanagh, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership