Michigan v. Bryant
United States Supreme Court
562 U.S. 344, 131 S. Ct. 1143, 179 L. Ed. 2d 93 (2011)
- Written by Christine Raino, JD
Facts
At 3:25 a.m. on April 29, 2001, police arrived at a gas station in response to a reported shooting and found Anthony Covington in severe pain suffering from a gunshot wound to his abdomen. As the officers arrived at different times, they each asked Covington questions about what had happened, who had shot him, and where the shooting had occurred. Covington responded that Richard (“Rick”) Bryant (defendant) had shot Covington through the door while Covington was on Bryant’s back porch and was turning to leave. Covington, who fled after being shot, described Bryant’s physical appearance and gave the location of Bryant’s home about six blocks from the gas station where police found him. Covington did not know Bryant’s location at the time of the questioning. While answering the officers’ questions, Covington asked repeatedly when emergency-medical-service providers would be arriving. Emergency medical services transported Covington to the hospital shortly thereafter, and he died a few hours later. A subsequent search of Bryant’s house turned up blood and a shell casing on the back porch and a bullet hole in the door. Bryant, however, had left. At Bryant’s trial for murder, the state offered the statements Covington made to police at the gas station. The trial court admitted the statements as excited utterances. The Michigan Supreme Court reversed the trial court, ruling that Covington’s statements were testimonial and did not fall within the emergency exception in Davis v. Washington. The State appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sotomayor, J.)
Concurrence (Thomas, J.)
Dissent (Ginsburg, J.)
Dissent (Scalia, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.