Michigan v. McQueen

828 N.W.2d 644, 493 Mich. 135 (2013)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Michigan v. McQueen

Michigan Supreme Court
828 N.W.2d 644, 493 Mich. 135 (2013)

  • Written by Patrick Speice, JD

Facts

Brandon McQueen (defendant) operated a medical-marijuana dispensary for qualified patients and primary caregivers registered under Michigan’s medical-marijuana law and paid a membership fee to join the dispensary. The dispensary held marijuana for its members and facilitated sales of marijuana among the members. The state (plaintiff) filed a lawsuit against McQueen in circuit court, seeking an injunction barring the dispensary from continuing to operate on the basis that the dispensary constituted a public nuisance under the Michigan law classifying any building used for the unlawful sale of marijuana as a public nuisance. The circuit court denied the state’s request for an injunction, ruling that the dispensary did not constitute a public nuisance because facilitating patient-to-patient medical-marijuana sales was lawful under Michigan’s medical-marijuana law. The state appealed, and the Michigan Court of Appeals overturned the circuit court’s decision, ruling that Michigan’s medical-marijuana law did not authorize patient-to-patient sales. McQueen appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Young, C.J.)

Dissent (Cavanagh, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership