Microsoft Corp. v. Commission

Case T-201/04R, ECLI:EU:T:2007:289 (European General Court 2008)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Microsoft Corp. v. Commission

European General Court
Case T-201/04R, ECLI:EU:T:2007:289 (European General Court 2008)

Facts

Microsoft Corp. (defendant) enjoyed a dominant position in the market for personal computer operating systems, with Microsoft’s Windows operating system having a 90 percent market share. The European Commission (commission) (plaintiff) initiated proceedings against Microsoft, alleging that Microsoft was abusing its dominant market position in violation of Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Specifically, the commission alleged that by bundling its own media player, Windows Media Player, with the Windows operating system, Microsoft effectively prevented competing media players from attaining market share. Also, the commission claimed that by refusing to provide workgroup-server-software competitors with the interoperability information necessary to connect with the Windows operating system, Microsoft prevented competitors from developing competing software. Microsoft had previously shared such interoperability information with other developers but stopped doing so once Microsoft developed its own workgroup-server software. The European General Court considered the commission’s arguments.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership