Microsoft Corp. v. Commission
European General Court
Case T-201/04R, ECLI:EU:T:2007:289 (European General Court 2008)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
Microsoft Corp. (defendant) enjoyed a dominant position in the market for personal computer operating systems, with Microsoft’s Windows operating system having a 90 percent market share. The European Commission (commission) (plaintiff) initiated proceedings against Microsoft, alleging that Microsoft was abusing its dominant market position in violation of Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Specifically, the commission alleged that by bundling its own media player, Windows Media Player, with the Windows operating system, Microsoft effectively prevented competing media players from attaining market share. Also, the commission claimed that by refusing to provide workgroup-server-software competitors with the interoperability information necessary to connect with the Windows operating system, Microsoft prevented competitors from developing competing software. Microsoft had previously shared such interoperability information with other developers but stopped doing so once Microsoft developed its own workgroup-server software. The European General Court considered the commission’s arguments.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.