Microsoft Corporation v. Commission of the European Communities

T-201/04 (2007)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Microsoft Corporation v. Commission of the European Communities

Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber)
T-201/04 (2007)

Facts

The Commission of the European Communities (the Commission) (defendant) found that Microsoft (plaintiff) abused its dominant position in multiple product markets in various ways in violation of Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). One abuse the Commission found was that Microsoft had a 60 percent market share in work-group server operating systems. For other companies to create software that ran on servers running Microsoft operating systems, knowledge of certain trade-secret protocol information was required. Microsoft would not release this information or allow its use. Therefore, companies could not create products to compete with Microsoft products. The Commission ordered Microsoft to release the protocol information and allow other companies to use it. Microsoft sought review in the Court of First Instance, arguing that the Commission’s order constituted a forced licensing of intellectual property and trade secrets in violation of European law.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership