Mid-State Investment Corporation v. O'Steen
Florida First District Court of Appeal
133 So. 2d 455 (1961)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
The O’Steens (plaintiffs) obtained a loan from the Mid-State Investment Corporation (defendant) to purchase a home. As part of the loan transaction, the O’Steens assigned the deed to the property to Mid-State in exchange for a contract for deed conditioned upon the O’Steens’ monthly loan payments. The contract provided that, should the O’Steens fail to make any payments, Mid-State retained the option to terminate the contract. In such case, the O’Steens would forfeit all payments already made and Mid-State would have the right to take possession of the property. After the O’Steens failed to make timely payments, a Mid-State agent acted to repossess the home and its contents by entering through a window. Thereafter, Mid-State sold the property. The O’Steens brought suit against Mid-State seeking damages for trespass and conversion of their personal property. The trial court found in favor of the O’Steens on the issue of liability. The judge submitted the issue of damages to the jury, instructing that the measure of damages for trespass is the value of the O’Steens’ property interest at the time of Mid-State’s trespass. The jury awarded $2,750 to the O’Steens. Mid-State appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Carroll, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.