Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Middlebrook-Anderson Co. v. Southwest Savings and Loan Association

California Court of Appeal, Fourth District
18 Cal. App. 3d 1023 (1971)


Facts

Middlebrook-Anderson Company (Middlebrook) (plaintiff) sold property in California to developers, who paid the purchase price partially by a purchase-money deed of trust. The parties intended that the deed of trust be second in priority to a construction loan that the buyers would later obtain. Rather than sign a formal subordination agreement, Middlebrook and the developers agreed that the construction-loan agreement would be recorded before the deed of trust. The buyers obtained a construction loan from Southwest Savings and Loan Association (Southwest) (defendant), based on representations that any funds loaned would be used only for construction on the property. Southwest deposited money into a construction-loan account and permitted the buyers to use $300,000 for nonconstruction purposes. After the funds were depleted, the buyers stopped work on the property. The escrow agent, Western Escrow Company (defendant), gave Middlebrook notice of default and later began foreclosure proceedings. Before foreclosure was complete, Middlebrook sued Southwest and Western Escrow on various grounds, including Southwest’s failure to limit the use of loan funds to construction. Middlebrook requested that the priority of Middlebrook’s deed of trust be restored. Southwest and Western Escrow argued that Middlebrook’s deed of trust was a second lien that was never subordinated pursuant to a subordination agreement, and therefore, there was no priority to be restored. The trial court dismissed the case for failure to state a claim. Middlebrook appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Gabbert, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.