Midwest Office Technology, Inc. v. American Alliance Insurance Co.
Iowa Supreme Court
437 N.W.2d 555 (1989)
- Written by Sheryl McGrath, JD
Facts
Midwest Office Technology, Inc. (Midwest) (plaintiff) was a business that maintained an inventory of products. The amount of Midwest’s inventory varied over time. Midwest bought a policy from American Alliance Insurance Co. (American) (defendant) to cover inventory loss. The insurance contract required Midwest to report the average value of Midwest’s inventory to American each month, and the insurance premium amount varied according to the monthly value of the inventory. Correspondingly, the insurance coverage amount for inventory loss varied according to the most recent inventory report submitted by Midwest, with a maximum coverage of $600,000. The reporting requirement in the insurance contract included the following provision: “At the time of any loss, if the insured has failed to file with the Company reports of values . . . this policy . . . shall cover . . . not more than the amounts included in the last report of values prior to the loss[.]” After the policy became effective, Midwest did not always comply with the monthly reporting requirement. Midwest’s last report identified the inventory value as $478,619. Subsequently, fire destroyed the inventory. At the time of the fire, the inventory had a value of more than $600,000. Midwest submitted an insurance claim for the $600,000 policy limit. American paid $478,619 on the claim, which was the dollar value reported in Midwest’s most recent inventory report. Midwest sued American for the $600,000 policy-limit coverage. The trial court entered judgment in favor of Midwest. American appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Schultz, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.