Milburn v. Life Investors Insurance Company of America
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
511 F.3d 1285 (2008)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Zella Milburn (plaintiff) purchased a long-term care insurance policy from Life Investors Insurance Company of America (LIICA) (defendant). Subsequently, Milburn moved into The Village on Lee, a licensed assisted-living facility in Oklahoma. The Village provided Milburn with daily personal care, medication assistance, and intermittent nursing care. Milburn submitted a claim for coverage to LIICA. LIICA denied the claim, stating that it only covered licensed nursing facilities, not assisted-living facilities. LIICA’s policy stated that it covered nursing facilities (1) that were licensed to primarily provide nursing care to inpatient residents; and (2) that provided 24-hour skilled nursing services, such as licensed nursing homes. LIICA’s policy did not specifically define “nursing facility.” By contrast, as an assisted-living facility, the Village was only licensed to provide unscheduled, intermittent nursing care to residents. Because the Village was not licensed to primarily provide skilled nursing care and therefore fell outside the policy’s coverage requirements, the district court rejected Milburn’s coverage claim. Milburn appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
Concurrence (Henry, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.