Miller Plastic Products, Inc.
National Labor Relations Board
372 N.L.R.B. No. 134 (2023)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Ronald Vincer (plaintiff) worked for Miller Plastic Products, Inc. (Miller) (defendant). Vincer was continually critical of Miller’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. At a company meeting at which Miller told its employees that they were essential workers who would need to continue working, Vincer shouted out, “we shouldn’t be working.” Miller terminated Vincer’s employment. Vincer filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), alleging that his criticisms were protected concerted activity under § 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (the act) and thus his termination violated § 8 of the act. An NLRB administrative-law judge (ALJ) found in Vincer’s favor. Miller appealed to the full NLRB.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.