Miller v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

84 F.2d 415 (1936)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Miller v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
84 F.2d 415 (1936)

KS

Facts

A. L. Miller (plaintiff) and Henry Hawk were the majority stockholders of the Enquirer-News Company. Miller and Hawk transferred their stock in Enquirer-News to Federated Publications, Inc. for a combination of cash valued at 75 percent of the consideration and stock in Federated Publications making up 25 percent of the consideration. Concurrently, Federated Publications acquired all of the remaining outstanding shares of Enquirer-News. After Miller filed his federal income tax return for 1928, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the commissioner) (defendant) identified deficiencies related to the Enquirer-News transaction. The commissioner argued that the gain realized by Miller through the Enquirer-News transaction must be taxed. The Board of Tax Appeals sustained deficiencies determined by the commissioner. Miller appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Simons, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership