Miller v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
492 S.E.2d 482, 25 Va. App. 727 (1997)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Martin Miller (defendant) was a convicted felon. Miller was a lifelong hunter and wanted to continue to hunt, but knew that it was illegal for him to own firearms after his felony conviction. Miller sold his hunting guns and began hunting with a bow and arrows. After his bow was stolen, Miller sought to determine whether he could legally own a muzzle-loading rifle. Miller knew that muzzle-loading rifles were treated differently under Virginia gun law and hunting regulations from other firearms. Miller asked his probation officer if he could legally own a muzzle-loading rifle, and also inquired with the Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF) and the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries (department). All of the government officials affirmatively assured Miller that he could legally own a muzzle-loading rifle, and Miller purchased one. Miller was then charged and convicted of knowingly and intentionally possessing a firearm following a felony conviction. Miller appealed, alleging that the conviction violated his right to due process of law.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Annunziata, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.