Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 16,800+ case briefs...

Miller v. Fenton

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
796 F.2d 598 (1986)


Police detective Boyce interviewed Frank Miller (defendant), the prime suspect in a brutal murder. Miller was a 32-year-old with some high school education who had served time before. Boyce assumed a friendly, sympathetic manner and initially falsely told Miller that the victim was still alive. Boyce said he was a brother who just wanted to help Miller unburden his conscience, and that Miller was not a criminal or responsible, just someone who needed help. Throughout the interview, Miller maintained a suspicious, guarded attitude and made remarks that showed that he understood he was in an ordinary police interrogation, not talking with a compassionate friend, and that confession could result in criminal charges and potentially conviction. After about 30 minutes, Miller began making incriminating statements. Miller ultimately confessed an hour into the interrogation then collapsed into an unresponsive state of shock. Police called an ambulance, which took Miller to the hospital, so his confession was never reduced to a written statement. The trial court admitted the tape-recorded confession into evidence and convicted Miller of murder. An intermediate state appellate court reversed, reasoning that the confession was involuntary. The New Jersey Supreme Court disagreed and reinstated the conviction. On federal habeas review, the Third Circuit found the confession admissible, deferring to the trial court's finding. However, the United States Supreme Court reversed, finding that the federal court should have independently reviewed the issue and remanded for redetermination using the correct standard.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Becker, J.)

Dissent (Gibbons, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 448,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 448,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 16,800 briefs, keyed to 224 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial