Miller v. French
United States Supreme Court
530 U.S. 327 (2000)
In 1975, French and other inmates (prisoners) (plaintiffs) brought a class-action suit against Miller, the Superintendent of the Pendleton Correctional Facility, and other officials (state) (defendants), for cruel and unusual punishment concerning conditions at the prison. The court issued an injunction in order to correct violations and improve living conditions for prisoners, and the injunctive relief remained in effect at the time of this suit. In 1996, Congress enacted the Prisoner Litigation Relief Act (PLRA), 18 U.S.C. § 3626, which set forth new standards governing when a court could enter prospective relief against a prison. If current injunctions were alleged not to meet the new standards, states could move for termination of the injunction, which would trigger an automatic stay of the injunction under § 3626(e)(2) of the PLRA. The state moved to terminate the injunction in 1997, and the prisoners moved to enjoin the automatic stay, arguing it violated separation-of-powers principles and due process rights. The district court granted the prisoners’ motion and enjoined the automatic stay. The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed and held the automatic stay provision of the PLRA unconstitutional as a violation of the separation of powers. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve a conflict among courts of appeal.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (O’Connor, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Souter, J.)
Dissent (Breyer, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.