Miller v. McCalla, Raymer, Padrick, Cobb, Nichols & Clark, L.L.C.
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
214 F.3d 872 (2000)

- Written by Alex Ruskell, JD
Facts
Miller (plaintiff) bought a house and later decided to rent it out when Miller got a new job. Miller fell behind on his loan, and the law firm McCalla, Raymer, Padrick, Cobb, Nichols & Clark, L.L.C. (defendant) sent Miller a collection letter. The letter stated that Miller owed $178,844.65, but also stated that Miller owed additional fees that Miller could discover by calling an 800 number. Miller sued McCalla for violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by failing to state the debt amount owed. McCalla responded that Miller was using the house as a rental so it was now a business debt to which the act did not apply. The court ruled in McCalla’s favor, and Miller appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Posner, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.