Logourl black

Miller v. U.S. Foodservice, Inc.

United States District Court for the District of Maryland
361 F. Supp 2d 470 (2005)


James Miller (plaintiff) was President, Chairman, and CEO of United States Foodservice, Inc. (USF) (defendant), and also served as a director of USF’s parent company, Koninklijke Ahold N.V. (Royal Ahold) (defendant). In July 2000, Miller received a letter from USF’s external auditor Deloitte & Touche stating that USF’s internal accounting controls were problematic. In 2003, Miller was forced to resign all his positions amid an accounting scandal. An internal investigation revealed irregularities and Royal Ahold had to revise downward and restate its earnings for the previous year. After resigning, Miller sued USF and Royal Ahold, seeking post-termination benefits he alleged he was entitled to according to his employment contract. USF and Royal Ahold countersued, alleging that Miller had breached his duties of care, good faith, and loyalty to the corporations, and that he was therefore not entitled to the benefits. The companies claimed that Miller had failed to implement proper internal systems despite warning signs, and that he intentionally misled USF’s audit committee for three years. Miller argued that he was being scapegoated. He moved to dismiss the counterclaims on the grounds that his actions were protected by the business judgment rule.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.


The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Blake, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Here's why 90,000 law students rely on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 12,195 briefs - keyed to 164 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.
Start Your Free Trial Now