Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Miller v. United States

United States Supreme Court
471 U.S. 130 (1985)


Facts

Miller (defendant) was charged under a grand jury indictment with acts of mail fraud relating to a staged burglary and subsequent misrepresentations of the value of his claim. One set of allegations charged Miller with fraud by consenting in advance to the burglary. A second set of allegations charged Miller with lying to his insurer about the value of materials stolen during the burglary. The government moved to strike the allegations of the indictment relating to Miller’s advance consent to the burglary. Miller insisted that the entire indictment be presented to the grand jury. Miller was convicted by a jury and appealed the judgment of conviction. Miller argued that the conviction violated his Fifth Amendment right to be tried only on a grand jury indictment because the guilty verdict was based solely upon evidence relating to the second set of allegations. The court of appeals concluded that it was possible that the grand jury would have issued no charges at all if the only evidence presented for its consideration had pertained to the second set of allegations. The court of appeals held that the prosecutorial amendment violated Miller’s right to be tried only on a grand jury indictment and vacated his conviction. The United States (plaintiff) petitioned the Supreme Court for review.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.