Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Milliken v. Pratt

125 Mass. 374, 28 Am.Rep. 241 (1878)

Case BriefQ&ARelatedOptions
From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...

Milliken v. Pratt

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

125 Mass. 374, 28 Am.Rep. 241 (1878)

Play video

Facts

In 1870, Daniel Pratt, a Massachusetts resident, entered into an agreement with Milliken and his business partner (plaintiffs), who operated a company, Derring, Milliken & Co. (DM & Co.), in Portland, Maine. The agreement allowed Pratt to make purchases from DM & Co. on credit. As a condition of the agreement, Milliken and his partner required a guaranty from Mrs. Pratt (defendant), under which she would agree to guarantee payment by her husband in the amount of $500. The guaranty made reference to its being made in Portland, Maine. Mrs. Pratt executed it at her home in Massachusetts; her husband then sent it by mail to Portland. At the time that the guaranty was made, Massachusetts law did not allow a married woman to act as a surety for her husband. Maine, on the other hand, permitted married women to enter such contracts. Over the next year and a half, Mr. Pratt made various purchases from DM & Co. Requests for purchases were all made to DM & Co.’s Portland address; all deliveries were made from Portland. Mr. Pratt timely paid for such purchases until the fall of 1871, at which point he held an unpaid balance of $560.12. After Mrs. Pratt refused to pay her husband’s debt, plaintiffs sued her in a Massachusetts court. By that point, Massachusetts law had changed so that a married woman had capacity to act as a surety for her husband. The trial court decided in favor of Mrs. Pratt. Plaintiffs appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gray, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 518,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 518,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions and answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 518,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 22,300 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership