Mills v. Tri-State Motor Transit Company

541 So. 2d 557 (1989)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Mills v. Tri-State Motor Transit Company

Alabama Court of Civil Appeals
541 So. 2d 557 (1989)

Facts

James Tucker and Ronald Mills (plaintiffs), both Alabama residents, worked for Tri-State Motor Transit Company (Tri-State) (defendant) as truck drivers. Tri-State’s headquarters was in Missouri, and Tucker and Mills mailed their employment applications to Tri-State’s Missouri headquarters. Tri-State required Tucker and Mills to complete orientation school in Missouri before it would check references and hire them. Once they were hired, Tucker and Mills hauled specialized freight cross-country, driving primarily outside of Alabama. Both Tucker and Mills suffered work injuries. Tucker was injured in Tennessee, and Mills was injured in Illinois, but both filed claims for workers’-compensation benefits in Alabama. Tri-State petitioned the Alabama trial court to issue writs of mandamus directing the trial court to dismiss the suits for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, arguing that Alabama workers’-compensation law did not apply to the claims and that the dedicated Missouri workers’-compensation tribunal was the proper venue.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ingram, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership