Mills v. Tri-State Motor Transit Company
Alabama Court of Civil Appeals
541 So. 2d 557 (1989)
- Written by Serena Lipski, JD
Facts
James Tucker and Ronald Mills (plaintiffs), both Alabama residents, worked for Tri-State Motor Transit Company (Tri-State) (defendant) as truck drivers. Tri-State’s headquarters was in Missouri, and Tucker and Mills mailed their employment applications to Tri-State’s Missouri headquarters. Tri-State required Tucker and Mills to complete orientation school in Missouri before it would check references and hire them. Once they were hired, Tucker and Mills hauled specialized freight cross-country, driving primarily outside of Alabama. Both Tucker and Mills suffered work injuries. Tucker was injured in Tennessee, and Mills was injured in Illinois, but both filed claims for workers’-compensation benefits in Alabama. Tri-State petitioned the Alabama trial court to issue writs of mandamus directing the trial court to dismiss the suits for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, arguing that Alabama workers’-compensation law did not apply to the claims and that the dedicated Missouri workers’-compensation tribunal was the proper venue.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ingram, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.