From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...
Miltiadous v. Tetervak
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
686 F. Supp. 2d 544 (2010)
Miltiadis Achillea Miltiadous (plaintiff) and Inna Tetervak (defendant) met and were married in Cyprus. Miltiadous was a citizen of Cyprus, and Tetervak was a citizen of Russia. Tetervak and Miltiadous had two children, both of whom were born in Cyprus. Tetervak and Miltiadous had a violent marriage. Miltiadous drank heavily, had anger issues, and was physically and emotionally abusive toward Tetervak. The children witnessed the abuse, which led the couple’s daughter to be diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder. Tetervak sought help from the Cyprus authorities, but to no avail. After Miltiadous and Tetervak were married for seven years, the family traveled to the United States to visit Tetervak’s family. While in the United States, a violent incident took place, which led Tetervak to seek a temporary restraining order (TRO) against Miltiadous. A TRO is a court order prohibiting a party from doing something until a request for injunctive relief is adjudicated. The Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas granted Tetervak’s request and ordered that Miltiadous stay away from Tetervak, that Tetervak be granted sole custody of the children, and that Miltiadous be granted supervised visitation. Miltiadous violated the order by contacting Tetervak, which led to Miltiadous’s arrest. Five months later, Tetervak and her children were granted permanent political asylum in the United States due to the ongoing threat of physical and emotional harm from Miltiadous in Cyprus. Miltiadous then filed an application for assistance under the Hague Convention, seeking the return of his children to Cyprus.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Robreno, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 517,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 517,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.