Miltiadous v. Tetervak
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
686 F. Supp. 2d 544 (2010)
- Written by Brittany Frankel, JD
Facts
Miltiadis Achillea Miltiadous (plaintiff) and Inna Tetervak (defendant) met and were married in Cyprus. Miltiadous was a citizen of Cyprus, and Tetervak was a citizen of Russia. Tetervak and Miltiadous had two children, both of whom were born in Cyprus. Tetervak and Miltiadous had a violent marriage. Miltiadous drank heavily, had anger issues, and was physically and emotionally abusive toward Tetervak. The children witnessed the abuse, which led the couple’s daughter to be diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder. Tetervak sought help from the Cyprus authorities, but to no avail. After Miltiadous and Tetervak were married for seven years, the family traveled to the United States to visit Tetervak’s family. While in the United States, a violent incident took place, which led Tetervak to seek a temporary restraining order (TRO) against Miltiadous. A TRO is a court order prohibiting a party from doing something until a request for injunctive relief is adjudicated. The Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas granted Tetervak’s request and ordered that Miltiadous stay away from Tetervak, that Tetervak be granted sole custody of the children, and that Miltiadous be granted supervised visitation. Miltiadous violated the order by contacting Tetervak, which led to Miltiadous’s arrest. Five months later, Tetervak and her children were granted permanent political asylum in the United States due to the ongoing threat of physical and emotional harm from Miltiadous in Cyprus. Miltiadous then filed an application for assistance under the Hague Convention, seeking the return of his children to Cyprus.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Robreno, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 778,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.