Minieri v. Knittel
Supreme Court, New York County
188 Misc. 2d 298, 727 N.Y.S.2d 872 (2001)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
Joanne Minieri (plaintiff) and Marta Knittel (defendant) met in 1996. They had a loving relationship as domestic partners until September 1999. However, Minieri and Knittel could not get married under the laws of New York because they were a same-sex couple. Minieri had a much larger income than Knittel. During their relationship, Minieri added Knittel to several accounts, including a joint checking account, a joint money-market account, and other joint financial accounts. In each case, Minieri made almost all of the contributions to the accounts. Additionally, Minieri purchased a condominium apartment in Manhattan, a house in East Hampton, and a 1999 Ford Explorer. For each of these purchases, Minieri used her funds but added Knittel on the title. Knittel asserts that she agreed to refrain from working in order to take care of the properties. Minieri and Knittel did not document any agreements as to these assets in writing. After they separated, Minieri sued Knittel, requesting that the court impose a constructive trust on these assets. Knittel filed a counterclaim, asserting claims for partition, breach of contract, and unjust enrichment. Minieri moved for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Braun, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.