Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie R.R. Co. v. United States

164 Ct. Cl. 226 (1964)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie R.R. Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims
164 Ct. Cl. 226 (1964)

Facts

Between 1909 and 1924, Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad Company and/or its successor (the taxpayer) (plaintiff) acquired more than 100,000 shares of stock in Wisconsin Central Railway (Wisconsin Central). Beginning in 1909, the taxpayer operated its own railroad and that of Wisconsin Central as one integrated operation. The taxpayer kept a balance of income and expenses attributable to Wisconsin Central, and if Wisconsin Central’s monthly income was not sufficient to pay for its expenses, the taxpayer would advance the funds to cover those expenses. In 1952, the taxpayer entered into an agreement that set an upper limit to the amount of the outstanding debt the taxpayer could recover from Wisconsin Central. In 1954, the amount the taxpayer would actually recover was set forth in a reorganization plan concerning Wisconsin Central. Wisconsin Central had not been able to meet its obligations to all of its secured creditors for many years, leaving nothing for its unsecured creditors. The taxpayer filed refund claims for: (1) a deduction in tax year 1952 (or alternatively 1954) for unsecured advances made to Wisconsin Central that became wholly worthless in that year and (2) a deduction in tax year 1952 (or alternatively 1954) for certain secured claims against Wisconsin Central memorialized in bond-interest coupons that became wholly or partially worthless in that year.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Laramore, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 782,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership