Minnesota Linseed Oil Co. v. Collier White Lead Co.
Circuit Court, District of Minnesota
17 F. Cas. 447 (1876)
- Written by Joseph Bowman, JD
Facts
Minnesota Linseed Oil Company (Minnesota) (plaintiff) originally sued Collier White Lead Company (Collier) (defendant) for $2,151 in a dispute arising from a contract. Collier, in turn, filed a counterclaim on a separate contract. Regarding its counterclaim, Collier alleged that the parties entered into a binding contract on August 3, 1875, whereby Minnesota would sell to Collier 12,450 gallons of linseed oil for the price of 58 cents per gallon. Collier further alleged that Minnesota breached this contract by failing to deliver the oil. Finally, Collier argued that because the market value of linseed oil had risen to 70 cents per gallon by August 3, it was entitled to damages stemming from Minnesota’s refusal to sell the oil at 58 cents per gallon. Notably, the transaction had been negotiated by telegraph in the following manner: (1) on July 29, Minnesota solicited an offer for the sale of oil from Collier, (2) on July 30, Collier requested 300 barrels for 55 cents per gallon, (3) on July 31, Minnesota transmitted a telegraph offering to sell the requested oil at 58 cents per gallon, but this message was allegedly not delivered to Collier until August 2, (4) on August 3, Collier accepted the offer of 58 cents per gallon by telegraph, (5) on August 3, Minnesota attempted to revoke its offer, but Collier asserted that the sale was complete before any withdrawal was received. Minnesota argued that there was no contract binding the parties to this transaction because Collier’s acceptance was not offered within a reasonable time of the offer.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Nelson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.