Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Minnesota Linseed Oil Co. v. Collier White Lead Co.

Circuit Court, District of Minnesota
17 F. Cas. 447 (1876)


Facts

Minnesota Linseed Oil Company (Minnesota) (plaintiff) originally sued Collier White Lead Company (Collier) (defendant) for $2,151 in a dispute arising from a contract. Collier, in turn, filed a counterclaim on a separate contract. Regarding its counterclaim, Collier alleged that the parties entered into a binding contract on August 3, 1875, whereby Minnesota would sell to Collier 12,450 gallons of linseed oil for the price of 58 cents per gallon. Collier further alleged that Minnesota breached this contract by failing to deliver the oil. Finally, Collier argued that because the market value of linseed oil had risen to 70 cents per gallon by August 3, it was entitled to damages stemming from Minnesota’s refusal to sell the oil at 58 cents per gallon. Notably, the transaction had been negotiated by telegraph in the following manner: (1) on July 29, Minnesota solicited an offer for the sale of oil from Collier, (2) on July 30, Collier requested 300 barrels for 55 cents per gallon, (3) on July 31, Minnesota transmitted a telegraph offering to sell the requested oil at 58 cents per gallon, but this message was allegedly not delivered to Collier until August 2, (4) on August 3, Collier accepted the offer of 58 cents per gallon by telegraph, (5) on August 3, Minnesota attempted to revoke its offer, but Collier asserted that the sale was complete before any withdrawal was received. Minnesota argued that there was no contract binding the parties to this transaction because Collier’s acceptance was not offered within a reasonable time of the offer.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Nelson, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.