Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Minnesota v. Block

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
660 F.2d 1240 (1981)


Facts

Congress passed the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness Act of 1978 (the act) to preserve the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness (BWCAW). The BWCAW encompassed 1,075,000 acres of land and water along the Minnesota-Canadian border. The federal government owned nearly 90 percent of the land. The State of Minnesota owned approximately 121,000 acres of land, in addition to the beds underneath 160,000 acres of navigable waters. Section 4 of the act restricted the use of motorboats and snowmobiles to designated areas within the BWCAW. The restriction applied to the land and waters owned by Minnesota. Congress enacted § 4 following extensive testimony and debate regarding the interference of motorized vehicles with the BWCAW’s use by canoeists, hikers, and skiers. The State of Minnesota; the National Association of Property Owners; and numerous individuals, businesses, and organizations (plaintiffs) sued the federal government (defendant), on the basis that Congress had exceeded its authority under the Property Clause of the United States Constitution by restricting the use of motorized vehicles on nonfederal land. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit heard appeals from three consolidated cases that challenged the act.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Bright, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 177,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.