Minnesota v. Carter
United States Supreme Court
525 U.S. 83, 119 S.Ct. 469, 142 L.Ed.2d 373 (1998)
The police received a tip from an anonymous informant that a drug transaction was transpiring in a first floor apartment. Based on the tip, an officer went to the apartment building and, while standing in an area frequently used by the public, he peered into the apartment through a crack in the blind and observed Johns and Crater (defendant) putting white powder into bags. He called headquarters, requested that a warrant be obtained, and an eventual search pursuant to the warrant revealed that the occupants of the apartment had been bagging cocaine. The apartment belonged to a woman who was present when the drugs were being packaged. Johns and Carter were from another state, had only been at the apartment for a few hours, and did not have a preexisting relationship with the owner of the apartment, who was simply allowing them to use the apartment to bag their drugs in exchange for cocaine. At trial, Carter claimed that his Fourth Amendment rights were violated and requested that the drug evidence be suppressed. The trial court denied the motion, holding that Carter was not an overnight social guest and thus could not claim Fourth Amendment protections. The trial court also found that the police officer’s observations prior to obtaining the warrant did not constitute a Fourth Amendment search. The state supreme court reversed, holding that Carter had standing to claim Fourth Amendment protections and that the officer’s observations constituted a search.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, C.J.)
Concurrence (Kennedy, J.)
Concurrence (Breyer, J.)
Concurrence (Scalia, J.)
Dissent (Ginsburg, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.