From our private database of 36,900+ case briefs...
Minnesota v. Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians
United States Supreme Court
536 U.S. 172 (1999)
Through a series of treaties entered in the mid-1800s, several bands of Chippewa Indians (Chippewa) agreed to sell their land to the United States. In exchange, the Chippewa received cash payments and a guarantee that they could continue to hunt, fish, and gather on their land (usufructary rights). The preservation of these rights was memorialized in the language of an 1837 treaty. In a later treaty, the Chippewa sold more land, again reserving their usufructary rights on the sold land. However, this treaty stated that those rights were subject to the Chippewa’s removal from the land at the direction of the president. In 1850, President Zachary Taylor issued an executive order removing the Chippewa from the land and revoking their usufructary rights. However, the government was unsuccessful in removing the Chippewa and, instead, signed a new treaty in 1855 under which the Chippewa agreed to sell all their remaining land and live on reservations. The 1855 treaty made no mention of usufructary rights. Minnesota became a state in 1858. In 1990, the Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians (plaintiffs) sued Minnesota (defendant) for a declaratory judgment that they still owned their usufructary rights under the 1837 treaty. Minnesota argued in response that the termination of usufructary rights was justified by (1) the 1850 executive order, (2) the 1855 treaty, and (3) Minnesota being admitted as a state.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (O’Connor, J.)
Dissent (Rehnquist, C.J.)
Dissent (Thomas, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 629,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 36,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.