Minnesota v. Olson
United States Supreme Court
495 U.S. 91 (1990)
- Written by Salina Kennedy, JD
Facts
Robert Olson (defendant) was the suspected getaway driver in a gas-station robbery and murder. Based on a series of credible tips, Minnesota (plaintiff) police tracked Olson to the upper unit of a duplex where he was staying as a houseguest. A probable-cause “arrest bulletin” had been issued for Olson’s arrest, but police did not have an arrest warrant. After speaking to the woman who lived in the unit and concluding that Olson was inside, police entered the unit without permission and found Olson hiding in a closet. Olson was arrested and taken to police headquarters, where he made a self-incriminating statement. At trial, Olson moved to suppress the statement, arguing that his arrest was illegal and thus his statement was tainted. Olson’s motion was denied, and he was convicted on one count of first-degree murder, three counts of robbery, and three counts of second-degree assault. On appeal, the Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that the warrantless arrest had been illegal and that therefore Olson’s statement was tainted and should have been suppressed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.