Minor v. United States
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
772 F.2d 1472 (1985)
- Written by Robert Taylor, JD
Facts
Ralph Minor (plaintiff) was a physician practicing with the Snohomish County Physicians Corporation (Snohomish Physicians). Minor elected to participate in Snohomish Physicians’ deferred-compensation plan. As a condition to receiving his deferred compensation, Minor agreed to refrain from working for Snohomish Physicians’ competitors and from practicing medicine after retirement. Snohomish Physicians established a trust that purchased retirement-annuity policies to provide for its future obligations under the plan. Snohomish Physicians was the sole beneficiary of the trust. Participants of the plan, including Minor, had no rights to the trust or its assets. The United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) sought to tax Minor on compensation that Minor had earned, but for which payment had been deferred under the plan. Minor paid the tax and then sued for a tax refund in federal district court. The district court held in favor of Minor, ruling that Minor’s contributions to the plan were not taxable in the year that the contributions were were made. The IRS appealed the district court’s ruling.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Goodwin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
