Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
M

Miramax Films Corp. v. Columbia Pictures Entertainment

996 F. Supp. 294 (1998)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Miramax Films Corp. v. Columbia Pictures Entertainment

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
996 F. Supp. 294 (1998)

Facts

Columbia Pictures Entertainment, Inc. (Columbia) (defendant) and Mandalay Entertainment, Inc. (Mandalay) (defendant) produced and distributed the slasher film I Know What You Did Last Summer. The film’s radio, television, and print advertising heavily emphasized the film’s origin as being “from the creator of Scream,” a similarly themed and highly successful movie from the previous year. Miramax Films Corporation (Miramax) (plaintiff), the distributor of Scream, brought suit for unfair competition under common law and the Lanham Act. Miramax alleged that the advertising campaign was intended to imply the involvement of Scream director Wes Craven in I Know What You Did Last Summer. However, the only creative link between the two films was a relatively unknown screenwriter, Kevin Williamson. Miramax presented the results of two surveys in which a significant number of moviegoers were under the impression that I Know What You Did Last Summer was a sequel to Scream or was directed by Craven, while no more than 2 percent understood the advertising campaign to refer to Williamson. Miramax moved for a preliminary injunction against Columbia and Mandalay’s advertising campaign.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cedarbaum, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Entertainment Law

Key Terms