Mirisawo v. Holder

599 F.3d 391 (2010)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Mirisawo v. Holder

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
599 F.3d 391 (2010)

Facts

Rosemary Mirisawo (plaintiff), a native and citizen of Zimbabwe, entered the United States in 1999 on a nonimmigrant employment visa to work as a housekeeper and left her four children with her brother and sister in Zimbabwe to do so. In 2002, Mirisawo returned to Zimbabwe for a month to visit her family. Several months earlier, Mirisawo’s brother, Tobias, had been severely beaten for opposing the President of Zimbabwe, Robert Mugabe. While in Zimbabwe, Mirisawo stayed with her sister to avoid being associated with Tobias’ activities. At the same time, Mirisawo purchased a home in Zimbabwe for Tobias and her children to live in. In May 2005, the Mugabe government destroyed thousands of homes and buildings in response to those citizens who opposed him. One of the homes almost completely destroyed belonged to Mirisawo. Three months prior to the expiration of her visa, Mirisawo filed an application for asylum with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Thereafter, Mirisawo’s visa expired and DHS initiated proceedings to remove her from the country. The immigration judge denied Mirisawo’s application for asylum on the ground that the destruction of her Zimbabwe home did not amount to past persecution because Mirisawo had never lived in the residence nor relied upon it for her livelihood. The judge further concluded that Mirisawo would not suffer future persecution if she returned to Zimbabwe based on the fact that she had not been harassed during her previous visit and that Mirisawo’s brother, sister, and children had not been harmed since Tobias’ beating in 2002. The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirmed the judge’s order. Mirisawo filed a petition against Attorney General Eric Holder, Jr., in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, appealing the decision of the BIA.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Niemeyer, J.)

Concurrence

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 744,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership