Misko v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
90 T.C.M. 15 (2005)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
Fred Misko (plaintiff) was an experienced lawyer who bought and used expensive video equipment to make video presentations for use at trial. Misko used the video equipment solely for his law firm and derived no personal pleasure or recreation from using the equipment. Misko also lectured other lawyers on how to make video presentations for trials and, on his accountant’s advice, leased out the video equipment and collected rental payments. Misko kept records related to the video equipment, including tracking amounts invested and rents received. Misko took deductions on his income taxes for depreciation on the leased equipment. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the commissioner) (defendant) denied the deductions for 1998 and 1999 and issued a deficiency notice, asserting that Misko could not deduct the depreciation because he was not engaged in the equipment-leasing activity for profit. Misko challenged the deficiency notice in the United States Tax Court, arguing that he intended to profit from the equipment-leasing activity.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kroupa, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.