Missouri ex rel. Koster v. Harris

847 F.3d 646 (2017)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Missouri ex rel. Koster v. Harris

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
847 F.3d 646 (2017)

  • Written by Haley Gintis, JD

Facts

In 2008, the California legislature passed a law requiring that all egg-producing facilities within the state comply with certain animal-care standards. In 2010, the California legislature passed a law prohibiting the sale of any eggs coming from noncompliant facilities. In 2013, the California Department of Food and Agriculture promulgated additional regulations concerning animal-care standards. The legislation and regulations were intended to go into effect in January 2015. Before the effective date, the Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster (plaintiff) sued California Attorney General Kamala Harris (defendant). Koster argued that the legislation and regulations violated the Commerce Clause and were preempted by federal laws. The complaint was amended so that officials from Nebraska, Oklahoma, Alabama, Kentucky, and Iowa (plaintiffs) could join. The states claimed they had parens patriae standing because the laws harmed their egg farmers by increasing production costs, would cause price fluctuations in eggs sold within their states, and discriminated against non-California citizens. The Humane Society of the United States and the Association of California Egg Farmers (associations) (defendants) joined the action. Harris and the associations filed motions to dismiss. The district court granted the motions with prejudice on the ground that the state officials lacked standing because the parens patriae requirements were not satisfied and because the claim was nonjusticiable.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Graber, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership