Missouri Public Service Co. v. Peabody Coal Co.
Court of Appeals of Missouri
583 S.W.2d 721, cert. denied, 444 U.S. 865, 100 S.Ct. 135, L.Ed.2d 88 (1979)
- Written by Matt Fyock, JD
Facts
Peabody Coal Co. (Peabody) (defendant) entered into a contract with respondent Missouri Public Service Co. (Public Service) (plaintiff) to supply Public Service with coal. When Peabody’s costs escalated sharply, Peabody several times attempted to negotiate a higher price per ton of coal delivered under the contract, but negotiations were unsuccessful. Peabody refused to continue delivering coal. Though it had adequate coal supplies and the ability to perform the contract, Peabody argued that its non-performance was justified because excessive economic loss excused non-performance under the doctrine of commercial impracticability. Public Service elected to consider Peabody in anticipatory breach of the contract and brought suit to compel specific performance. The trial court ordered specific performance and Peabody appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Swofford, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
