Missouri v. Moran

297 S.W.3d 100 (2009)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Missouri v. Moran

Missouri Court of Appeals
297 S.W.3d 100 (2009)

Facts

Alta Moran (defendant) went to prison for three years on a felony conviction. Missouri placed Moran’s children, M.R.E. and D.D.D., in the custody of Ed and Toni Anderson. After Moran got out of jail, the Andersons feared contact by Moran and sought and received ex parte child-protection orders against Moran that prohibited her from contacting, threatening, abusing, or stalking her children, among other things. Moran received personal service of the orders. The following month, Moran happened to be sitting in a parked car on a street as her son, M.R.E., rode past on his bicycle. Moran yelled out to M.R.E. that she would get him back. Moran’s tone was threatening, and M.R.E. returned home visibly upset. M.R.E. isolated himself; did not play outside; stopped eating, causing him to lose weight; cried more often; and was aggressive when asked about his behavior. Moran continued to approach both children in a menacing manner, saying that she would get them back. Moran was arrested on six counts of violating the child-protection orders, assault, and disturbing the peace. One count alleged that M.R.E. was emotionally abused when Moran yelled that she would get him back. At Moran’s trial, both children testified. M.R.E. testified that Moran’s threat upset him because he did not want to live with Moran. D.D.D. testified that, before trial, Moran had threatened to kill her if she gave testimony. After the evidence was presented, Moran moved for acquittal on the count alleging abuse of M.R.E. Moran admitted that she yelled that she would get M.R.E. back, but she asserted that this conduct was not sufficient to constitute emotional abuse, which was not defined in Missouri law. The trial court denied Moran’s motion for acquittal, and a jury found Moran guilty on all counts. Moran appealed and conceded that an order was entered, that she had received notice of the order, and that she made the statement alleged. However, Moran asserted that her conduct did qualify as abuse.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Pfeiffer, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership