Missouri v. Seibert
United States Supreme Court
542 U.S. 600 (2004)
Seibert (defendant) was arrested for the killing of a teenage boy in a fire. Without being read her Miranda warnings, Seibert was questioned for 30 to 40 minutes until she admitted to knowing that it was intended that the boy die in the fire. After this confession, Seibert was given a 20-minute break and then brought in for more questioning. At this point, she was read her Miranda warnings. She was then asked the same questions again, being reminded of her initial answers where the police deemed necessary. Seibert confessed again. This system, an initial interrogation followed by Miranda warnings and then a second interrogation, was standard practice in this Missouri county. The trial court allowed Seibert’s second confession to be admitted into evidence and the court of appeals affirmed. The state supreme court reversed, holding that the statement should be suppressed because the interrogation was continuous and the second statement was the product of the first, invalid statement. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Souter, J.)
Concurrence (Breyer, J.)
Concurrence (Kennedy, J.)
Dissent (O'Connor, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 170,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.