Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Mitchell v. C.C. Sanitation Company, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas
430 S.W.2d 933 (1968)


Facts

R. L. Mitchell (plaintiff) was a truck driver for Herrin Transportation Company (Herrin). Mitchell was injured when his truck was hit by William W. Crane (defendant), a truck driver for C.C. Sanitation Company, Inc. (C.C. Sanitation) (defendant). Mitchell sued the defendants for approximately $40,000.00 in damages, which included pain and suffering, lost wages, loss of earning capacity, and medical expenses. Herrin sustained damages totaling $388.65, which included damages to its truck and a payment made to Mitchell’s physician as a result of the accident. Herrin had its claim for $388.65 handled by Ross C. Hall of Southwestern Claims Adjustment Company. Hall prepared two releases in favor of the defendants. The first was signed by Herrin and Mitchell for the $388.65, representing Herrin’s damages. The second was signed by Mitchell and represented $62.12 he had spent for medical care. Mitchell brought suit against Crane and C.C. Sanitation seeking to set aside the two releases on the grounds that he had signed them under duress. Mitchell alleged that Hall, working for Herrin and in conjunction with C.C. Sanitation, had threatened that Mitchell would lose his job if he did not sign the releases. According to Mitchell, he would not have otherwise signed the releases. The defendants moved for summary judgment on the ground that the releases were enforceable. The trial court granted the motion.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Johnson, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Tunks, C.J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 222,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.