Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Mitchell v. C.C. Sanitation Company, Inc.

430 S.W.2d 933 (1968)

Case BriefQ&ARelatedOptions
From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...

Mitchell v. C.C. Sanitation Company, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas

430 S.W.2d 933 (1968)

Facts

R. L. Mitchell (plaintiff) was a truck driver for Herrin Transportation Company (Herrin). Mitchell was injured when his truck was hit by William W. Crane (defendant), a truck driver for C.C. Sanitation Company, Inc. (C.C. Sanitation) (defendant). Mitchell sued the defendants for approximately $40,000.00 in damages, which included pain and suffering, lost wages, loss of earning capacity, and medical expenses. Herrin sustained damages totaling $388.65, which included damages to its truck and a payment made to Mitchell’s physician as a result of the accident. Herrin had its claim for $388.65 handled by Ross C. Hall of Southwestern Claims Adjustment Company. Hall prepared two releases in favor of the defendants. The first was signed by Herrin and Mitchell for the $388.65, representing Herrin’s damages. The second was signed by Mitchell and represented $62.12 he had spent for medical care. Mitchell brought suit against Crane and C.C. Sanitation seeking to set aside the two releases on the grounds that he had signed them under duress. Mitchell alleged that Hall, working for Herrin and in conjunction with C.C. Sanitation, had threatened that Mitchell would lose his job if he did not sign the releases. According to Mitchell, he would not have otherwise signed the releases. The defendants moved for summary judgment on the ground that the releases were enforceable. The trial court granted the motion.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Johnson, J.)

Dissent (Tunks, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 518,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 518,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions and answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 518,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 22,300 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership