Mitchell v. Cohen
United States Supreme Court
333 U.S. 411 (1948)
- Written by Alex Hall, JD
Facts
Section 2 of the Veterans’ Preference Act (act) gave preference in government employment to “ex-servicemen and women who have served on active duty in any branch of the armed forces of the United States, during any war” and released “under honorable conditions.” Two servicemen (the servicemen) (plaintiffs) were members of the Volunteer Port Security Force (force), a division of the Coast Guard Reserve. Membership in the force was voluntary and temporary, and members could generally disenroll upon request. Other than being covered for expenses for uniforms and food during 12 hours of weekly active duty, members were not paid for their service and could continue working for their civilian employers. Congress passed the act in 1944, before the servicemen disenrolled from the force. Following the act’s passage, the Civil Service Commission (commission) ruled that members of the force were not entitled to veterans’ preference in federal employment, even though the commission had previously determined them eligible under prior law. After the servicemen disenrolled from the force, they were denied veterans’ preference. The servicemen brought an action to compel the commission to deem them eligible. The servicemen argued that they fell within the plain meaning of the word “ex-servicemen” and pointed to § 18 of the act, which preserved preference rights given before the act was passed. According to the servicemen, they were given preference under the commission’s initial determination of eligibility, and that eligibility could not be revoked. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the servicemen, and the court of appeals affirmed. The United States Supreme Court accepted the case on writ of certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Murphy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.