Logourl black

Mitchell v. Federal Intermediate Credit Bank

Supreme Court of South Carolina
164 S.E. 136 (S.C. 1932)


Facts

Mitchell (plaintiff) took out a loan from the Federal Intermediate Credit Bank (Bank) (defendant), assigning as security the proceeds from the sale of a crop of potatoes to the Bank for two notes, worth $9,000 total. The sale ended up being worth $18,000, but Mitchell did not receive any of the proceeds. The Bank brought suit on the two notes to recover the $9,000, and Mitchell pleaded the above facts as a defense, but did not file a counterclaim. The court found in his favor in that initial suit. Subsequently, Mitchell brought this suit to recover the surplus from the potato sale. Mitchell alleged the same facts as he did in his defense in the initial suit. The trial court held that Mitchell could not bring the claim because it was merged in the original suit. Mitchell appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Stabler, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.