Mitsubishi Resin, Inc. v. Takano
Japan Supreme Court
27 Minshu 11 1536 (1973)
- Written by Kelly Simon, JD
Facts
After graduating from college, Takano (plaintiff) began working for Mitsubishi Resin, Inc. (Mitsubishi) (defendant) on a three-month trial basis. At the end of the trial period, Mitsubishi dismissed Takano. The company explained that Takano had provided inaccurate information on his personal history, concealing that he was a member of the Student Council, a radical student group, while at university. Mitsubishi had based its decision to terminate his employment on this information about Takano’s previous political activities. Takano filed a lawsuit against Mitsubishi, arguing that the Japanese constitution prevented the company from dismissing him. Takano alleged that Mitsubishi had violated Takano’s rights to freedom of belief and equality under the law, as protected by the Japanese constitution, by terminating his employment because of his constitutionally protected political activities.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.